top of page

Why It’s Time to Retire the Term “Soft Skills” — And Embrace Power Employability Skills Instead

  • Jun 1
  • 3 min read

For decades, workforce development has relied on the term “soft skills” to describe the human competencies that make work… work. Communication. Adaptability. Emotional regulation. Problem‑solving. Collaboration. Professionalism. These are the skills that determine whether someone keeps a job, grows in a job, or becomes a leader in their workplace.


And yet, we still call them soft — a word that implies “optional,” “secondary,” “less rigorous,” or “less valuable.”


At The Works System Curriculum, we believe it’s time for the workforce field to let that term go. Not because language is trendy, but because language shapes expectations, investment, and outcomes. When we call something “soft,” we unconsciously treat it as less essential. And the data, employers, and lived experience of jobseekers tell a very different story.


 “Soft” Skills Are Not Soft — They Are the Hardest Skills to Teach, Practice, and Master


Technical skills can be taught in weeks, months. Human skills take time to develop and can be cultivated and grown throughout a lifetime.


Employers consistently report that the most difficult competencies to hire for are:

  • Adaptability in changing environments

  • Emotional regulation under stress

  • Communication across differences

  • Problem‑solving when the path isn’t clear

  • Teamwork and conflict navigation

  • Self‑management and reliability


These are not soft. They are complex, durable, and transferable across every industry.

They are also the skills that determine whether someone can sustain employment — especially adults navigating reentry, recovery, homelessness, trauma, or career transition.


Employers Are Clear: Human Skills Are the #1 Hiring Priority


Across national employer surveys in 2025–2026, hiring managers consistently rank human-centered competencies as more important than technical skills for long-term success.

Why? Because technology changes. Job descriptions change. Industries change. But human skills remain relevant no matter what the economy does.


Employers know that they can teach someone how to use a software program. What they can’t teach as easily is how to:

  • Show up consistently

  • Communicate respectfully

  • Manage frustration

  • Solve problems without shutting down

  • Work through conflict

  • Adapt when the unexpected happens


These are the skills that keep people employed — and help them advance.


“Soft Skills” Undermines the Dignity and Strength of the People We Serve


Language matters deeply in workforce development, especially when working with adults who have been historically marginalized or underestimated.

Calling these competencies “soft” can unintentionally reinforce harmful narratives:

  • That people who struggle with communication or emotional regulation are “weak”

  • That these skills are less valuable than technical skills

  • That human development is secondary to job placement


But we know the truth: Human skills are power skills. They are the foundation of agency, confidence, and long-term economic mobility.


When we rename them, we reframe them — not as deficits to fix, but as strengths to build.


Power Employability Skills Reflect What Workforce Development Actually Teaches


The Works System Curriculum uses the term Power Employability Skills because it captures what these competencies truly are:

  • Powerful — They unlock opportunity.

  • Employability-focused — They directly impact job readiness and retention.

  • Skills — They can be taught, practiced, strengthened, and measured.


Other terms used across the field — human skills, essential workforce skills, durable skills — all point to the same truth: These are the skills that determine whether someone can thrive in the workplace.


They are not soft. They are essential. They are powerful.


The Term “Soft Skills” Was Never Accurate to Begin With


The phrase originated in the U.S. Army in the late 1960s to distinguish “people skills” from “machine skills.” It was never meant to describe the modern workforce — and it certainly wasn’t designed with equity, trauma-informed practice, or adult learning in mind.


Today’s workforce realities demand a new vocabulary that reflects:

  • The complexity of human behavior

  • The neuroscience of learning and emotional regulation

  • The realities of trauma and recovery

  • The expectations of employers

  • The dignity and agency of adult learners


The term “soft skills” simply cannot carry that weight.


Reframing the Language Changes the Outcomes


When workforce programs shift from “soft skills” to power employability skills, something important happens:

  • Learners take the work more seriously

  • Employers recognize the rigor behind the training

  • Funders understand the economic impact

  • Instructors teach with greater intentionality

  • Programs can measure outcomes more effectively



Language is not cosmetic. Language is strategy.


If we want a stronger workforce, a more equitable economy, and more sustainable employment outcomes, we must stop calling these skills “soft.”


They are power skills. They are essential skills. They are human skills. And they are the foundation of every successful career.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page